Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1298%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
8
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy