Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (2010MHz vs 1178MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 148W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +215%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980MX
3.92 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1664
96
TMUs
104
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.5 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.920 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
122.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
148W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-GXX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy