Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2010MHz vs 1470MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +36%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Max Q
9.032 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
24
3072
Shading Units
3072
96
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
96
24
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
70.56 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
141.1 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.032 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.032 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
141.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X4
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net