NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (2010MHz vs 1450MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+177%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5500M
4.454 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1450 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
96
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.909 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.454 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
278.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 ULA
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
