Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +34205%
12.35 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
0.036 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.800 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.00 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M72
-
GPU Variant
M72-S (216QSAKA12FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy