Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2673%
10.29 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
0.371 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M8x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.280 GPixel/s
160.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.280 GTexel/s
10.29 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
371.2 GFLOPS
160.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M88
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy