NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2010MHz vs 1250MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 210W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+37%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 56
8.96 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1138 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
3584
96
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.00 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
280.0 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.960 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
560.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
210W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
