NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2040MHz vs 2010MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+195%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6500M
4.178 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.6 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.356 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.178 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
