NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2034MHz vs 2010MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+69%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M
7.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1224 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
66
3072
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
264
24
RT Cores
28
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
