NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 640 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 640 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2010MHz vs 1218MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+692%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 640 Mobile
1.559 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1082 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1218 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.49 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.72 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.559 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.559 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
