NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (2010MHz vs 1301MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+32%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
9.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2018
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1138 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1301 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
3584
96
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.26 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
291.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.65 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.326 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
582.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
