NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (2010MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+406%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2.437 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Vega 12
-
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
