NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2010MHz vs 1455MHz)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+27%
12.35 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
9.684 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Blackwell-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
952 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
26
3072
Shading Units
3328
96
TMUs
104
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
104
24
RT Cores
26
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.3 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.684 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.684 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
151.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GB206
-
GPU Variant
GB206
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
10.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
