Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A530M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A530M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Arc A530M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1455MHz vs 1300MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +123%
8.94 TFLOPS
Arc A530M
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
96
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
192
24
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy