NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+1762%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
