Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 315M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 315M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +22823%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce 315M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.78 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
14W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N11M-GE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy