NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+773%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
