Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E6465

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E6465

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +4556%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
160
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Caicos
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy