NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2004
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
12
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV41
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
