Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +2290%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-IV

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy