Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1124%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
0.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.40 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
729.6 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy