Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1100%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M315
0.745 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.760 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.28 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
745.0 GFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
745.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
46.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Meso
-
GPU Variant
Meso LE (216-0864046)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy