NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1455MHz vs 1035MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+68%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
80
24
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.12 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.80 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.299 TFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
82.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
12 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
