NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1200MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

2176 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +315%

8.94 TFLOPS

Radeon E9260 PCIe

2.15 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation

VS

Radeon E9260 PCIe

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Sep 2016

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

Embedded

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

1090 MHz

1455 MHz

Boost Clock

1200 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

112.0GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

-

Compute Units

14

3072

Shading Units

896

96

TMUs

48

ROPs

16

96

Tensor Cores

-

24

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

12 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

19.20 GPixel/s

139.7 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.60 GTexel/s

8.940 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

2.150 TFLOPS

8.940 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.150 TFLOPS

139.7 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Baffin

-

GPU Variant

Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 4.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

5 nm

Process Size

14 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

3 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

123 mm²

Board Design

35W

TDP

80W

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA GeForce G110M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

5

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

6

AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD