Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1455MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +655%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M365X
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy