Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (2115MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +835%
12.99 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-GX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy