Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 560

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +599%
12.99 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 560
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
-
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Polaris 21
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy