Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5725

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +3515%
15.62 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
4608
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

115W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy