Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (1695MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +2367%
15.62 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy