NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+28700%
23.04 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
80
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
