NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (2550MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+183%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
100
5120
Shading Units
12800
160
TMUs
400
64
ROPs
176
160
Tensor Cores
400
40
RT Cores
100
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
