NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+3113%
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
