NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2250MHz vs 1395MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 403.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 16 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+130%
23.04 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 16 GB
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
56
5120
Shading Units
3584
160
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
448
40
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
