NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2250MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+650%
23.04 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
96
40
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
