NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+3675%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
512bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
