Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy