NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1665MHz vs 1300MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+364%
24.72 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
5.325 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+365%
5329
Arc Pro A60M
1144
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
2048
232
TMUs
128
80
ROPs
64
232
Tensor Cores
256
58
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
110W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
