Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +3874%
24.72 TFLOPS
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
901 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.83GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.480 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.92 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy