NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1665MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3319%
24.72 TFLOPS
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
384
232
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
8
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.528 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.11 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.7 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.11 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK208
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
