Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +4337%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
5
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy