CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
VS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+2904%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VS
Quadro 4000M
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
336
192
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
2
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
3
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
4
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
8
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
9
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
10
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy