Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1668%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy