Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +794%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
1344
192
TMUs
112
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy