NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1746MHz vs 1700MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+237%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
208
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
13312
240
TMUs
832
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
Aldebaran
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
GCN 5.1
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
