Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +83247%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
80
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
12W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy