Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +1764%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
14
6144
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
80
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
900W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy