Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +535%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy