NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
+15549%
8.294 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
24
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
