Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 95% (2025MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +940%
8.294 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy