Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 107% (2025MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +1002%
8.294 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy